首页 产品 科研 科学叙事 品牌动态 关于超级元料 联系 立即购买
文献解读 · SCIENCE NARRATIVELITERATURE REVIEW · SCIENCE NARRATIVE

线粒体为什么会成为衰老研究的中心Why Mitochondria Have Become Central to Aging Research

从线粒体结构、能量转换、质量控制、线粒体 DNA、炎症信号与细胞命运出发,理解多套维护系统如何在衰老过程中共同收窄协调余量。A bilingual literature review of mitochondrial structure, energy conversion, quality control, mitochondrial DNA, inflammatory signaling, and the narrowing coordination reserve seen with aging.

——解读《Mitochondria at the heart of aging: structure, function, and failure》

搬一箱水、连续爬几层楼,或者久坐后突然做一场运动,身体常会留下些“余波”:腿酸得比以前久,小腿偶尔抽动,腰背发紧,第二天醒来仍觉得没有完全松下来。出现这些现象的原因有很多,如电解质变化、姿势、运动负荷、睡眠等等,但它们都在提示:活动停下之后,身体的收尾工作才刚刚开始。而在这其中,线粒体也在紧锣密鼓地开展供能、运输、清理和重建工作。

肌肉收缩后,钙离子要回到合适的位置,细胞膜两侧的离子差需要重新建立;被拉扯、氧化或错误折叠的蛋白质要接受检查,能继续使用的修整后留下,损伤过重的则被拆解回收;新的原料还要被送到需要修补的位置。一次恢复,依赖供能、运输、清理和重建重新接上节奏。

2026年4月24日,Hany E. Marei在《Journal of Translational Medicine》第24卷发表综述《Mitochondria at the heart of aging: structure, function, and failure》,文章号716。[1] 这是一篇综述文章,主要工作是整合既有研究。作者在文章中把线粒体放在结构、能量转换、线粒体DNA、质量控制、炎症信号和细胞命运的交会处,试图回答一个更重要的问题:

线粒体为什么会成为衰老研究的中心?衰老为什么常表现为多套维护系统一起失去协调余量?

本文前五部分沿用这篇综述的主要框架,并以经典机制研究补充解释;涉及146名成年人、45名健康受试者和38名老年人的人数、剂量与周期,来自另外列出的原始人体研究。

一、先看结构:线粒体为什么不只是一块“电池”

可以把线粒体想成一座建在细胞里的小型换能站。外膜围出边界,内膜向里反复折叠,形成一排排被称为“嵴”的褶皱。这些褶皱像在有限厂房里增加工作台,让呼吸链复合体和ATP合酶拥有更大的排列面积。[1][3]

食物中的碳水、脂肪和部分氨基酸经过分解,会把高能电子交给呼吸链。电子沿内膜上的复合体逐级传递,释放的能量把质子泵到内膜一侧;质子再经ATP合酶回流,推动ATP生成。这个过程像先把水抽到高处蓄势,再让回流带动涡轮。ATP就是细胞可以直接调用的能量形式,用于肌肉收缩、神经传递、物质运输以及修复与合成。

结构和功能在这里从一开始就连在一起。嵴形态会影响呼吸链复合体如何排列,内膜完整性决定质子梯度能否保持,膜两侧的电位差既参与ATP生成,也帮助线粒体摄取钙离子,并推动一部分蛋白进入线粒体。膜或嵴出现持续损伤时,受影响的往往不只是“发电量”,还包括钙离子处理、蛋白导入和损伤识别。[1][3]

人体线粒体含有上千种蛋白,绝大多数由细胞核DNA编码,先在细胞质中合成,再借助靶向序列和膜上的转位装置进入线粒体,这就是上文所说的蛋白导入;其中进入基质或内膜的一部分过程依赖膜电位。而线粒体内也有DNA,但线粒体DNA的功能不同,它负责的是编码系统:13个氧化磷酸化相关多肽、22种转运RNA和2种核糖体RNA。[1][3] 两套基因组必须配合,线粒体才能完成自身蛋白合成和稳定供能。

二、供能变慢时,真正收窄的是整条维护链的余量

线粒体在细胞中并非一颗颗固定不动的电池。它们会融合,也会分裂。融合让不同线粒体共享部分内容物,帮助网络度过短期压力;分裂可以把状态较差的区域隔开,为后续处理创造条件。膜电位持续偏低、损伤较重的线粒体,还可能被线粒体自噬识别、包裹并送去降解。[5][6]

这套维护讲究接力。分裂过多,网络容易碎片化;融合持续过强,受损区域又可能难以及时隔离;清理速度赶不上损伤出现的速度,低效线粒体便会在细胞里停留更久。更麻烦的是,识别、运输、降解和重建本身也需要能量。旧部件处理不完,新任务还在进入,细胞就容易从“有余量地调整”转向“勉强维持”。[1]

人体数据给出了一个可观察的切面。Short等研究了146名18—89岁的健康成年人,发现骨骼肌线粒体ATP生成速率平均每10年下降约8%;按线粒体蛋白量校正后,下降幅度仍约为5%。最大摄氧量也呈相近趋势,线粒体ATP生成速率与最大摄氧量存在相关。[4]

这项研究是横断面观察,比较的是不同年龄组,不能推断每个人都会按同一速度下降,也不能完全排除活动量、身体组成和健康状态的影响。它更适合帮助我们理解“余量”:年龄增长时,线粒体通常不会突然停止工作;更常见的变化是,面对相同负荷时,可供调度和补偿的空间可能逐渐缩小。

三、线粒体DNA:平时负责编码,位置不对时也会成为警报

线粒体DNA首先是一套遗传信息。它编码呼吸链中的部分核心亚基,并提供线粒体内部合成这些多肽所需的RNA。它以多个拷贝存在于线粒体中,和相关蛋白共同组成类核结构。复制、包装和修复任何一环发生偏差,都可能影响能量转换。[1]

当线粒体膜受损,或受损线粒体没有被及时清除,部分线粒体DNA可能进入细胞质或细胞外。对先天免疫系统来说,DNA出现在“不该出现的位置”本身就是危险线索,可激活cGAS-STING等通路,并带动干扰素和炎症相关反应。[7] 原本用于供能的遗传材料,由此参与了细胞向外发出的压力提醒。

适度而短暂的提醒有助于调动清理和修复。警报反复出现、迟迟不能解除时,局部环境便可能维持在低度炎症状态;炎症和氧化压力又会继续影响线粒体膜、蛋白和DNA,形成相互牵动的循环。线粒体因此连接了能量变化与免疫沟通,也让“损伤有没有被及时收尾”成为理解衰老的重要线索。

四、修复、暂停或退出:线粒体状态怎样影响细胞命运

面对压力,细胞并非只有一种反应。损伤较轻、资源仍然充足时,细胞可以降低部分合成和增殖活动,把能量让给修复、抗氧化和自噬;压力持续存在、继续分裂风险较高时,部分细胞会进入细胞衰老状态,停止分裂,但仍保持代谢并改变分泌信号;损伤过重时,线粒体膜通透性和相关蛋白变化还可能推动程序性死亡。[1][8]

“暂停”和“退出”在短期内都具有保护意义。暂停能避免带着损伤继续复制,程序性死亡可以移除难以挽回的细胞。问题出现在这些过程不能顺利收尾时:衰老细胞长期积累,会释放炎症因子、蛋白酶和基质重塑信号,改变邻近细胞的工作环境;死亡细胞若没有被及时清除,局部警报也可能延长。[8]

由单个细胞走向组织层面的逻辑由此变得清楚。一个细胞暂停,可能是在保护组织;越来越多细胞长期暂停,组织可调用的工作单元就会减少;周围环境持续受到炎症和基质信号影响,干细胞更新、免疫清理和组织修复也会更难协调。线粒体没有独自决定衰老,却参与了细胞该继续工作、暂时停下还是有序退出的判断。

五、它为什么会成为衰老研究的中心

这里所说的“中心”,强调许多路径会在线粒体处交会,并不意味着所有衰老变化都由线粒体单独引起。基因组稳定性影响呼吸链成分,营养感知决定资源偏向生长还是维护,自噬负责清走低效部件,NAD⁺和氧化还原状态连接能量与压力信号,细胞衰老和炎症又把局部变化传递给周围组织。[1][2]具体的介绍可参考我们的系列文章《身体为什么会逐渐失去恢复力》

这些路径还会彼此反馈。电子传递受阻可能增加氧化压力;氧化和炎症信号继续损伤膜与DNA;清理受损线粒体需要能量;清理不足又进一步拖累供能。综述真正强调的,是一种系统性的适应能力下降:早期变化可能是补偿,持续时间过长或无法解除后,补偿本身也会成为负担。[1]

这也提醒我们谨慎理解“线粒体健康”。一次疲劳、一个血液指标或某种成分浓度,都不能代表完整的线粒体网络。研究需要同时看分子变化、目标组织是否真正获得成分、线粒体功能是否改变,以及变化能否落实到活动能力或其他人体结局。

六、从机制走到营养补充,需要跨过三道证据门槛

规律活动、充足睡眠、完整饮食和慢性问题管理,会从不同方向影响线粒体的负荷与更新。膳食补充剂可以提供稳定、可量化的营养输入,但至少要连续回答三个问题:能否被人体吸收,能否进入目标细胞和线粒体,最终能否改变可重复的人体功能结局。

麦角硫因是膳食补充剂原料中线粒体研究的热门之一。[9] 2024年,Fong等用质谱直接证明麦角硫因能够进入并积累在线粒体;[10]2025年发表于《Cell Metabolism》的研究又提出一条更具体的机制:运动训练后,麦角硫因在小鼠骨骼肌线粒体中增加,并直接结合3-巯基丙酮酸硫转移酶(3-mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase,MPST)。MPST参与含硫物质转化和硫化氢相关代谢;在该研究的细胞与小鼠实验中,这条通路与线粒体呼吸和运动表现变化相连。[11] 它用实验解释了“麦角硫因可能怎样作用于线粒体”。

现有人体研究先回答了吸收问题。一项双盲、安慰剂对照研究中,45名健康成年人分别每日摄入5毫克、25毫克纯麦角硫因或安慰剂,持续7天。两种剂量均提高了血液麦角硫因水平,尿液排出量低于摄入量的4%。[12] 这个结果支持麦角硫因在人体的短期吸收与保留,有助于麦角硫因在人体线粒体中的进一步的研究。

辅酶Q10位于线粒体内膜,是呼吸链复合体I、II把电子传向复合体III时的重要载体,也是维持膜内氧化还原平衡的一部分。[3] 要判断口服补充是否真正触及线粒体,需要直接观察目标组织。2026年一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验纳入54名健康、经常活动的成年男性,每日补充300毫克还原型辅酶Q10(ubiquinol)或安慰剂,持续6周。补充后血浆辅酶Q10升高,肌肉活检显示复合体I相关呼吸的偶联效率有所改善;但最大运动能力、摄氧动力学和恒定负荷运动时间没有组间差异。这项研究的价值在于,它在人群中直接测量了骨骼肌线粒体,说明分子和线粒体层面的变化可能早于可感知的运动表现,二者不能画等号。[13]

面向老年人的研究则提供了功能层面的线索。2025年一项随机、双盲试验纳入38名65—75岁的久坐成年人,两组都完成8周高强度间歇训练,其中一组每日补充100毫克辅酶Q10,另一组使用安慰剂。与单纯训练组相比,辅酶Q10组在5次坐站和30秒坐站测试中的改善更明显,提示下肢起立能力和重复发力可能获得额外支持;握力、平衡、起立行走和6分钟步行距离没有显示额外优势。[14] 样本量较小,而且辅酶Q10与训练同时使用,因此结果适合解释为“可能帮助部分老年人提高训练适应”,不能延伸为辅酶Q10单独逆转衰老。把两项研究放在一起,更有用的判断是:辅酶Q10是否产生实际价值,要看剂型、剂量、使用周期、基础状态,以及研究测量的是线粒体效率还是身体功能。

结语:理解线粒体,也是在理解身体怎样重新接上节奏

线粒体处在衰老研究的中心,来自它对多条路径的连接:内膜与嵴承载能量转换,融合、分裂和自噬维护网络,线粒体DNA既保存遗传信息,也可能在位置异常时发出警报,细胞命运再把局部状态带向组织层面。

随着年龄增长,身体面对的核心挑战往往是协调余量逐渐收窄。SUPER-SYN关注的恢复力,也体现在这里:经历活动、压力和日常消耗后,供能能否跟上,损伤能否被清理,修复材料能否到位,警报能否在任务结束后慢慢安静下来。

读懂一项线粒体研究,需要同时看机制、研究对象、剂量、周期、目标组织和真实功能结局。保留这些层次,才能把科学线索放回日常生活,也让每一个关于“抗衰老”或“改善线粒体”的判断更接近证据本身。

参考文献

  1. Marei HE. Mitochondria at the heart of aging: structure, function, and failure. Journal of Translational Medicine. 2026;24:716. doi:10.1186/s12967-026-08047-8.
  2. López-Otín C, Blasco MA, Partridge L, Serrano M, Kroemer G. Hallmarks of aging: an expanding universe. Cell. 2023;186(2):243-278. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.11.001.
  3. Spinelli JB, Haigis MC. The multifaceted contributions of mitochondria to cellular metabolism. Nature Cell Biology. 2018;20(7):745-754. doi:10.1038/s41556-018-0124-1.
  4. Short KR, Bigelow ML, Kahl J, et al. Decline in skeletal muscle mitochondrial function with aging in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. 2005;102(15):5618-5623. doi:10.1073/pnas.0501559102.
  5. Youle RJ, van der Bliek AM. Mitochondrial fission, fusion, and stress. Science. 2012;337(6098):1062-1065. doi:10.1126/science.1219855.
  6. Pickles S, Vigié P, Youle RJ. Mitophagy and quality control mechanisms in mitochondrial maintenance. Current Biology. 2018;28(4):R170-R185. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2018.01.004.
  7. West AP, Khoury-Hanold W, Staron M, et al. Mitochondrial DNA stress primes the antiviral innate immune response. Nature. 2015;520(7548):553-557. doi:10.1038/nature14156.
  8. Wiley CD, Campisi J. From ancient pathways to aging cells—connecting metabolism and cellular senescence. Cell Metabolism. 2016;23(6):1013-1021. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2016.05.010.
  9. Gründemann D, Harlfinger S, Golz S, et al. Discovery of the ergothioneine transporter. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. 2005;102(14):5256-5261. doi:10.1073/pnas.0408624102.
  10. Fong ZW, Cheah IK, Tan YSL, et al. Ergothioneine and mitochondria: an important protective mechanism? Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2024;726:150269. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2024.150269.
  11. Sprenger HG, Mittenbühler MJ, Sun Y, et al. Ergothioneine controls mitochondrial function and exercise performance via direct activation of MPST. Cell Metabolism. 2025;37(4):857-869.e9. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2025.01.024.
  12. Cheah IK, Tang RMY, Yew TSZ, Lim KHC, Halliwell B. Administration of pure ergothioneine to healthy human subjects: uptake, metabolism, and effects on biomarkers of oxidative damage and inflammation. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling. 2017;26(5):193-206. doi:10.1089/ars.2016.6778.
  13. Acton JP, et al. Effect of six weeks ubiquinol supplementation on mitochondrial respiratory function and exercise capacity in healthy males: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial. European Journal of Applied Physiology. Published online June 6, 2026. doi:10.1007/s00421-026-06275-w.
  14. Bagheri N, Kargarfard M, Bagheri R, Dutheil F. Effects of coenzyme Q10 supplementation on physical function adaptations to high-intensity interval training in older adults: a randomized controlled trial. Nutrients. 2025;17(24):3959. doi:10.3390/nu17243959.

—A Review of “Mitochondria at the Heart of Aging: Structure, Function, and Failure”

Carry a case of water, climb several flights of stairs in a row, or suddenly exercise after sitting for a long time, and the body may be left with a few lingering “aftereffects”: muscle soreness that lasts longer than it used to, occasional twitching in the calves, tightness in the lower back, or a sense the next morning that the body has not fully loosened up. Many factors can contribute to these experiences, including changes in electrolytes, posture, exercise load, and sleep. Together, however, they point to one basic reality: once the activity stops, the body’s recovery work is only beginning. During this period, mitochondria are also busy supporting energy supply, transport, clearance, and rebuilding.

After a muscle contracts, calcium ions must return to the appropriate locations and ion gradients across the cell membrane need to be restored. Proteins that have been stretched, oxidized, or misfolded must be inspected: those that remain usable are repaired and retained, while those that are too severely damaged are broken down and recycled. New building materials must then be delivered to the sites that need repair. Recovery depends on energy supply, transport, clearance, and rebuilding reconnecting into a coordinated rhythm.

On April 24, 2026, Hany E. Marei published the review “Mitochondria at the Heart of Aging: Structure, Function, and Failure” in Volume 24 of the Journal of Translational Medicine, article 716.[1] As a review, the paper primarily integrates existing research. Marei places mitochondria at the intersection of structure, energy conversion, mitochondrial DNA, quality control, inflammatory signaling, and cell fate, using this framework to address a broader question:

Why have mitochondria become central to aging research? And why does aging so often appear as a simultaneous loss of coordination reserve across multiple maintenance systems?

The first five sections of this article follow the main framework of the review and add explanations from classic mechanistic studies. The participant numbers, doses, and intervention periods involving 146 adults, 45 healthy participants, and 38 older adults come from the separately cited original human studies.

1. Start with Structure: Why Mitochondria Are More Than Cellular “Batteries”

Mitochondria can be thought of as small energy-conversion stations built inside cells. The outer membrane defines the boundary, while the inner membrane repeatedly folds inward to form structures known as cristae. These folds are like adding more workbenches within a limited factory floor, creating more surface area on which respiratory-chain complexes and ATP synthase can be organized.[1][3]

As carbohydrates, fats, and some amino acids from food are broken down, they transfer high-energy electrons to the respiratory chain. The electrons move stepwise through complexes in the inner mitochondrial membrane, and the energy released is used to pump protons to one side of the membrane. The protons then flow back through ATP synthase, driving ATP production. The process is similar to pumping water uphill to store potential energy and then using the returning flow to turn a turbine. ATP is the form of energy cells can use directly for muscle contraction, nerve signaling, material transport, repair, and synthesis.

Structure and function are interconnected from the outset. The shape of cristae influences how respiratory-chain complexes are arranged, while the integrity of the inner membrane determines whether the proton gradient can be maintained. The electrical potential across the membrane contributes to ATP production, helps mitochondria take up calcium ions, and supports the import of certain proteins into mitochondria. When the membrane or cristae sustain ongoing damage, the consequences can extend beyond reduced “power output” to calcium handling, protein import, and damage recognition.[1][3]

Human mitochondria contain more than a thousand proteins. Most are encoded by nuclear DNA, synthesized first in the cytoplasm, and then imported into mitochondria through targeting sequences and translocation machinery in the membrane. This is the process of protein import described above; some import into the matrix or inner membrane depends on membrane potential. Mitochondria also contain their own DNA, but mitochondrial DNA serves a distinct coding role: it encodes 13 oxidative-phosphorylation-related polypeptides, 22 transfer RNAs, and 2 ribosomal RNAs.[1][3] The two genomes must work together for mitochondria to carry out their own protein synthesis and maintain stable energy production.

2. When Energy Supply Slows, the Reserve of the Entire Maintenance Chain Narrows

Mitochondria are not fixed, isolated batteries inside cells. They fuse and divide. Fusion allows different mitochondria to share some of their contents, helping the network cope with short-term stress; fission can isolate regions in poorer condition and prepare them for further processing. Mitochondria with persistently low membrane potential or more severe damage may also be recognized by mitophagy, enclosed, and sent for degradation.[5][6]

This maintenance system depends on a relay of coordinated steps. Excessive fission can fragment the network; persistently excessive fusion may make damaged regions harder to isolate in time; and when clearance cannot keep pace with the appearance of damage, inefficient mitochondria remain in the cell for longer. More importantly, recognition, transport, degradation, and rebuilding all require energy themselves. When old components cannot be processed before new demands arrive, cells can shift from adapting with reserve capacity to simply managing to keep up.[1]

Human data provide one observable window into this process. Short and colleagues studied 146 healthy adults aged 18–89 and found that the rate of mitochondrial ATP production in skeletal muscle declined by an average of about 8% per decade; after adjustment for mitochondrial protein abundance, the decline was still about 5%. Maximal oxygen uptake showed a similar age-related trend, and mitochondrial ATP production rate was correlated with maximal oxygen uptake.[4]

This was a cross-sectional study comparing different age groups. It cannot show that every individual declines at the same rate, nor can it fully exclude the influence of physical activity, body composition, or health status. Its greater value is in illustrating the idea of “reserve”: mitochondria do not usually stop working abruptly with age. A more common change is that the room available for adjustment and compensation under the same workload may gradually become smaller.

3. Mitochondrial DNA: Genetic Code in Its Proper Place, an Alarm When Misplaced

Mitochondrial DNA is first and foremost a set of genetic information. It encodes some of the core subunits of the respiratory chain and provides the RNA required for mitochondrial synthesis of these polypeptides. Multiple copies are present within mitochondria, where they combine with associated proteins to form nucleoid structures. Disruption in replication, packaging, or repair can affect energy conversion.[1]

When mitochondrial membranes are damaged, or when damaged mitochondria are not cleared in time, some mitochondrial DNA can enter the cytoplasm or extracellular space. For the innate immune system, DNA appearing in a location where it does not normally belong is itself a danger signal. It can activate pathways such as cGAS–STING and promote interferon- and inflammation-related responses.[7] Genetic material normally involved in energy production can therefore become part of the cell’s outward stress signal.

A moderate, short-lived warning can help mobilize clearance and repair. When alarms recur and fail to resolve, however, the local environment may remain in a state of low-grade inflammation. Inflammation and oxidative stress can then continue to affect mitochondrial membranes, proteins, and DNA, creating mutually reinforcing feedback. Mitochondria therefore connect changes in energy metabolism with immune communication, making the timely resolution of damage an important clue for understanding aging.

4. Repair, Pause, or Exit: How Mitochondrial State Helps Shape Cell Fate

Cells have more than one way to respond to stress. When damage is limited and resources remain sufficient, a cell can reduce some synthesis and proliferation activities and redirect energy toward repair, antioxidant defenses, and autophagy. When stress persists and continued division carries greater risk, some cells enter cellular senescence: they stop dividing while remaining metabolically active and altering the signals they secrete. When damage becomes severe, changes in mitochondrial membrane permeability and related proteins can also promote programmed cell death.[1][8]

Both “pausing” and “exiting” can be protective in the short term. A pause helps prevent damaged cells from continuing to replicate, while programmed cell death can remove cells that are too compromised to recover. Problems arise when these processes fail to resolve cleanly. Senescent cells that accumulate over time can release inflammatory factors, proteases, and extracellular-matrix remodeling signals, changing the working environment of neighboring cells. If dead cells are not cleared promptly, local warning signals may also persist.[8]

The progression from individual cells to tissue-level effects then becomes easier to see. One cell pausing may help protect the tissue; when increasing numbers of cells remain paused for long periods, the tissue has fewer functional units available. Persistent inflammatory and matrix-related signals in the surrounding environment can also make stem-cell renewal, immune clearance, and tissue repair harder to coordinate. Mitochondria do not determine aging on their own, yet they participate in the cellular decision of whether to keep working, temporarily pause, or exit in an orderly manner.

5. Why Mitochondria Have Become Central to Aging Research

Here, “central” means that many pathways converge on mitochondria; it does not imply that mitochondria alone cause every age-related change. Genomic stability affects components of the respiratory chain, nutrient sensing determines whether resources are directed toward growth or maintenance, autophagy removes inefficient components, NAD+ and redox status connect energy metabolism with stress signaling, and cellular senescence and inflammation transmit local changes to surrounding tissues.[1][2] For more detail, see our series “Why the Body Gradually Loses Its Capacity to Recover.”

These pathways also feed back on one another. Impaired electron transport can increase oxidative stress; oxidative and inflammatory signals can continue to damage membranes and DNA; clearing damaged mitochondria requires energy; and insufficient clearance can further weaken energy production. What the review ultimately emphasizes is a systemic decline in adaptive capacity: early changes may be compensatory, but when they persist too long or cannot be resolved, the compensation itself can become a burden.[1]

This also reminds us to interpret “mitochondrial health” cautiously. A single episode of fatigue, one blood marker, or the concentration of one compound cannot represent the state of an entire mitochondrial network. Research needs to examine molecular changes, whether a compound actually reaches the target tissue, whether mitochondrial function changes, and whether those changes translate into activity capacity or other human outcomes.

6. From Mechanism to Nutritional Supplementation: Three Evidence Thresholds Must Be Crossed

Regular physical activity, sufficient sleep, a complete diet, and management of chronic health issues can influence mitochondrial workload and renewal from different directions. Dietary supplements can provide stable, quantifiable nutritional inputs, but at least three questions must be answered in sequence: Can the compound be absorbed by the human body? Can it enter target cells and mitochondria? And can it ultimately change reproducible functional outcomes in humans?

Ergothioneine is one of the dietary supplement ingredients drawing attention in mitochondrial research.[9] In 2024, Fong and colleagues used mass spectrometry to directly demonstrate that ergothioneine can enter and accumulate in mitochondria.[10] A 2025 study published in Cell Metabolism proposed a more specific mechanism: after exercise training, ergothioneine increased in mouse skeletal-muscle mitochondria and directly bound to 3-mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase (MPST). MPST participates in sulfur-containing compound conversion and hydrogen-sulfide-related metabolism. In the cell and mouse experiments reported in that study, this pathway was linked to changes in mitochondrial respiration and exercise performance.[11] The work offers an experimental explanation of how ergothioneine may act on mitochondria.

Existing human research first addresses absorption. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 45 healthy adults received 5 mg or 25 mg of pure ergothioneine per day, or placebo, for 7 days. Both doses increased blood ergothioneine levels, while urinary excretion was less than 4% of the ingested amount.[12] These findings support the short-term absorption and retention of ergothioneine in humans and provide a basis for further research on ergothioneine in human mitochondria.

Coenzyme Q10 is located in the inner mitochondrial membrane. It is an important carrier that transfers electrons from respiratory-chain complexes I and II to complex III, and it also contributes to maintaining redox balance within the membrane.[3] To determine whether oral supplementation actually reaches mitochondrial biology, target tissues need to be examined directly. A 2026 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolled 54 healthy, regularly active adult men who received either 300 mg of reduced coenzyme Q10 (ubiquinol) per day or placebo for 6 weeks. Supplementation increased plasma coenzyme Q10, and muscle biopsies showed some improvement in the coupling efficiency of complex-I-related respiration. However, there were no between-group differences in maximal exercise capacity, oxygen-uptake kinetics, or time to exhaustion during constant-load exercise. The value of this study is that it directly measured skeletal-muscle mitochondria in humans, showing that molecular and mitochondrial-level changes may occur before perceptible changes in exercise performance; the two should not be treated as equivalent.[13]

Research in older adults provides additional clues at the functional level. A 2025 randomized, double-blind trial enrolled 38 sedentary adults aged 65–75. Both groups completed 8 weeks of high-intensity interval training; one group also received 100 mg of coenzyme Q10 per day, while the other received placebo. Compared with training alone, the coenzyme Q10 group showed greater improvement in the five-times sit-to-stand and 30-second sit-to-stand tests, suggesting possible additional support for rising from a seated position and repeated lower-limb force production. No additional advantage was observed for grip strength, balance, timed up-and-go performance, or six-minute walking distance.[14] The sample was small, and coenzyme Q10 was used together with exercise training. The results are therefore best interpreted as suggesting that coenzyme Q10 may help some older adults adapt to training, rather than as evidence that coenzyme Q10 alone reverses aging. Taken together, the two studies point to a more useful question: whether coenzyme Q10 has practical value depends on formulation, dose, duration of use, baseline status, and whether a study measures mitochondrial efficiency or whole-body function.

Conclusion: Understanding Mitochondria Means Understanding How the Body Reconnects Its Recovery Rhythm

Mitochondria sit at the center of aging research because they connect multiple pathways. The inner membrane and cristae support energy conversion; fusion, fission, and mitophagy maintain the network; mitochondrial DNA stores genetic information and can also trigger alarms when it appears in abnormal locations; and cell-fate decisions carry local changes into tissue-level effects.

As we age, one of the body’s core challenges is the gradual narrowing of its coordination reserve. The resilience that SUPER-SYN focuses on is reflected here as well: after activity, stress, and everyday demands, can energy supply keep pace, can damage be cleared, can repair materials reach where they are needed, and can warning signals gradually quiet down once the task is over?

Understanding a mitochondrial study requires looking at the mechanism, study population, dose, duration, target tissue, and real functional outcomes at the same time. Preserving these layers helps place scientific findings back into everyday life and brings each judgment about “anti-aging” or “improving mitochondria” closer to the evidence itself.

References

  1. Marei HE. Mitochondria at the heart of aging: structure, function, and failure. Journal of Translational Medicine. 2026;24:716. doi:10.1186/s12967-026-08047-8.
  2. López-Otín C, Blasco MA, Partridge L, Serrano M, Kroemer G. Hallmarks of aging: an expanding universe. Cell. 2023;186(2):243-278. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.11.001.
  3. Spinelli JB, Haigis MC. The multifaceted contributions of mitochondria to cellular metabolism. Nature Cell Biology. 2018;20(7):745-754. doi:10.1038/s41556-018-0124-1.
  4. Short KR, Bigelow ML, Kahl J, et al. Decline in skeletal muscle mitochondrial function with aging in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. 2005;102(15):5618-5623. doi:10.1073/pnas.0501559102.
  5. Youle RJ, van der Bliek AM. Mitochondrial fission, fusion, and stress. Science. 2012;337(6098):1062-1065. doi:10.1126/science.1219855.
  6. Pickles S, Vigié P, Youle RJ. Mitophagy and quality control mechanisms in mitochondrial maintenance. Current Biology. 2018;28(4):R170-R185. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2018.01.004.
  7. West AP, Khoury-Hanold W, Staron M, et al. Mitochondrial DNA stress primes the antiviral innate immune response. Nature. 2015;520(7548):553-557. doi:10.1038/nature14156.
  8. Wiley CD, Campisi J. From ancient pathways to aging cells—connecting metabolism and cellular senescence. Cell Metabolism. 2016;23(6):1013-1021. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2016.05.010.
  9. Gründemann D, Harlfinger S, Golz S, et al. Discovery of the ergothioneine transporter. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. 2005;102(14):5256-5261. doi:10.1073/pnas.0408624102.
  10. Fong ZW, Cheah IK, Tan YSL, et al. Ergothioneine and mitochondria: an important protective mechanism? Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2024;726:150269. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2024.150269.
  11. Sprenger HG, Mittenbühler MJ, Sun Y, et al. Ergothioneine controls mitochondrial function and exercise performance via direct activation of MPST. Cell Metabolism. 2025;37(4):857-869.e9. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2025.01.024.
  12. Cheah IK, Tang RMY, Yew TSZ, Lim KHC, Halliwell B. Administration of pure ergothioneine to healthy human subjects: uptake, metabolism, and effects on biomarkers of oxidative damage and inflammation. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling. 2017;26(5):193-206. doi:10.1089/ars.2016.6778.
  13. Acton JP, et al. Effect of six weeks ubiquinol supplementation on mitochondrial respiratory function and exercise capacity in healthy males: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial. European Journal of Applied Physiology. Published online June 6, 2026. doi:10.1007/s00421-026-06275-w.
  14. Bagheri N, Kargarfard M, Bagheri R, Dutheil F. Effects of coenzyme Q10 supplementation on physical function adaptations to high-intensity interval training in older adults: a randomized controlled trial. Nutrients. 2025;17(24):3959. doi:10.3390/nu17243959.
合规免责声明本文仅用于营养科学与健康生活方式科普,不构成医学建议、疾病诊断、治疗或预防建议。文中涉及的细胞、动物及人体研究用于说明科学背景,不等同于具体产品功效承诺。文中剂量均为所引研究的试验条件,不构成个人使用建议。膳食补充剂不能替代均衡饮食、健康生活方式或必要的医疗处理。孕妇、哺乳期女性、儿童、慢性病患者及正在使用药物者,使用相关产品前应咨询医生或其他合格专业人士。
Compliance DisclaimerThis article is intended solely for education in nutritional science and healthy lifestyles. It does not constitute medical advice or recommendations for the diagnosis, treatment, or prevention of disease. The cell, animal, and human studies discussed are presented to explain the scientific background and do not represent efficacy claims for any specific product. All doses mentioned are the experimental conditions used in the cited studies and should not be interpreted as personal-use recommendations. Dietary supplements are not a substitute for a balanced diet, a healthy lifestyle, or necessary medical care. Pregnant or breastfeeding women, children, people with chronic conditions, and individuals taking medications should consult a physician or other qualified healthcare professional before using relevant products.
返回科学叙事Back to Science Narratives查看产品View Products